Coverage proof · onchain.wick.pics

The two biggest free token-safety APIs
refuse PulseChain. We return a verdict.

Ask GoPlus or Honeypot.is about a token on PulseChain (chain 369) and you get an error — the chain isn't on their list. The same token through onchain.wick.pics returns a real rug/honeypot verdict with evidence. Below are the actual live responses, plus the exact commands so you can verify every word yourself.

● Re-verified live 2026-06-19 — token: HEX (0x2b59…eb39 — the flagship PulseChain token)

The receipts

Same token. Same question — "is this safe?" Three APIs, side by side.

GoPlus no PulseChain

api.gopluslabs.io — token_security

GET /api/v1/token_security/369?contract_addresses=0x2b59…eb39

{
  "code": 2022,
  "message": "The main chain is not supported",
  "result": null
}

✗ Chain 369 absent from GoPlus's 43 supported chains. No answer.

Honeypot.is no PulseChain

api.honeypot.is — IsHoneypot v2

GET /v2/IsHoneypot?address=0x2b59…eb39&chainID=369

{
  "code": 400,
  "error": "Invalid chain"
}

✗ Rejects chain 369 outright. No answer.

onchain.wick.pics real verdict

onchain.wick.pics — /api/v1/check

GET /api/v1/check?chain=pulsechain&address=0x2b59…eb39

{
  "symbol": "HEX",
  "verdict": "SAFE",
  "score": 90,
  "confidence": "high",
  "checks": [
    contract ✓, liquidity ✓ ($334k),
    honeypot ✓ (sim passed),
    lp_burned ⚠ (0% burned)
  ]
}

✓ Full evidence — including a live honeypot simulation, the exact check Honeypot.is can't run here. Answered.

Coverage is table stakes — the real test is catching a live rug.

A real PulseChain token with a 14% sell tax: you can buy in, but you lose ~14% trying to get out. The big tools can't even look at it — we measure it with a live on-chain round-trip simulation.

● Captured live 2026-06-22 — token: 4WMM (0x8bf4…7792 — a confirmed fee-on-transfer rug)

GoPlus no PulseChain

api.gopluslabs.io — token_security

GET /api/v1/token_security/369?contract_addresses=0x8bf4…7792

{
  "code": 2022,
  "message": "The main chain is not supported",
  "result": null
}

✗ Can't assess it — the rug is invisible to GoPlus.

Honeypot.is no PulseChain

api.honeypot.is — IsHoneypot v2

GET /v2/IsHoneypot?address=0x8bf4…7792&chainID=369

{
  "code": 400,
  "error": "Invalid chain"
}

✗ Rejects chain 369 — the rug is invisible to Honeypot.is.

onchain.wick.pics caught it

onchain.wick.pics — /api/v1/check

GET /api/v1/check?chain=pulsechain&address=0x8bf4…7792

{
  "symbol": "4WMM",
  "verdict": "HIGH_RISK",
  "score": 36,
  "honeypot": {
    "status": "warn",
    "measuredTaxPct": 14.1,
    "roundTripLossPct": 14.94,
    "detail": "measured sell tax ~14.1% — costs real money to exit"
  }
}

✓ Flagged HIGH_RISK — measured the 14.1% sell tax with a live on-chain round-trip buy→sell simulation, the exact check the others can't run here.

And we see through fake liquidity.

Every price feed agents trust reads DexScreener's headline "liquidity." That number is the token side valued at market price — so a one-sided pool (common on 9mm V3) shows millions you cannot actually sell into. We measure the REAL exit liquidity from on-chain reserves.

● Verified on-chain 2026-06-22 — token: Crystite (0x2fA6…EC45 — a 9mm V3 one-sided DAI pool)

DexScreener headline misleading

the "liquidity" number most tools + price feeds read

{
  "liquidity": { "usd": 12463848 }
}

✗ 20M tokens valued at market price — looks deeply liquid.

onchain.wick.pics real reserves

on-chain pool reserves = what you can actually sell into

{
  "realExitLiquidity": "~$35",
  "poolReserve": "17.59 DAI",
  "verdict": "HIGH_RISK"
}

✓ One-sided pool — 17 DAI backing 20M tokens. You couldn't sell $100 into it. We read the chain, not the headline.

Read this honestly — it's a coverage gap, not a quality claim. GoPlus and Honeypot.is are excellent tools on the 40+ chains they support (Ethereum, BSC, Base, Arbitrum, Monad and more). This page makes one narrow, verifiable point: PulseChain (chain 369) is simply not on their list, so if your tokens live there, they hand you an error. We built specifically for the long-tail chains the big scanners skip — so we return a verdict where they return nothing. If you're on a chain they cover, use them; if you're on PulseChain, that's the gap we fill.

Verify it yourself

Don't take our word for it — that's the point. Paste these into a terminal.

Three curls, ~10 seconds

The PulseChain coverage gap is a fact about the public APIs, not a marketing line. Run it:

# GoPlus — chain 369 → "main chain is not supported"
curl "https://api.gopluslabs.io/api/v1/token_security/369?contract_addresses=0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39"

# Honeypot.is — chain 369 → "Invalid chain"
curl "https://api.honeypot.is/v2/IsHoneypot?address=0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39&chainID=369"

# onchain.wick.pics — same token → a real verdict (free, no key)
curl "https://onchain.wick.pics/api/v1/check?chain=pulsechain&address=0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39"

Why trust our verdicts

Coverage is worthless if the answer is junk. So we publish our work.

We run a green-team track record — published security findings on real protocols, dated and falsifiable (see the cases). The safety engine returns evidence, not just a number: contract checks, liquidity, ownership, honeypot heuristics. We'd rather flag our limits than oversell — every verdict is informational, heuristic, and not financial advice. A "LOW_RISK 90" means our checks found no major red flags, not a guarantee. Always DYOR.
Try a free check → 🔑 Hold $WICK → unlimited API docs Green-team cases
Method & honesty. Responses above were captured live on 2026-06-19 by querying each public API for HEX (0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39) on PulseChain (chain 369). GoPlus's supported-chain list (43 chains) was fetched the same day and does not include 369. We make no claim about these tools on chains they do support — there, they're first-rate. We do not claim our verdicts are infallible; they are heuristic safety signals for agents, bots and traders, not financial advice. This page exists to prove one specific, checkable fact: the PulseChain safety gap is real, and we fill it.