Coverage proof · onchain.wick.pics
Ask GoPlus or Honeypot.is about a token on PulseChain (chain 369) and you get an error — the chain isn't on their list. The same token through onchain.wick.pics returns a real rug/honeypot verdict with evidence. Below are the actual live responses, plus the exact commands so you can verify every word yourself.
● Re-verified live 2026-06-19 — token: HEX (0x2b59…eb39 — the flagship PulseChain token)Same token. Same question — "is this safe?" Three APIs, side by side.
api.gopluslabs.io — token_security
GET /api/v1/token_security/369?contract_addresses=0x2b59…eb39
{
"code": 2022,
"message": "The main chain is not supported",
"result": null
}
✗ Chain 369 absent from GoPlus's 43 supported chains. No answer.
api.honeypot.is — IsHoneypot v2
GET /v2/IsHoneypot?address=0x2b59…eb39&chainID=369
{
"code": 400,
"error": "Invalid chain"
}
✗ Rejects chain 369 outright. No answer.
onchain.wick.pics — /api/v1/check
GET /api/v1/check?chain=pulsechain&address=0x2b59…eb39
{
"symbol": "HEX",
"verdict": "SAFE",
"score": 90,
"confidence": "high",
"checks": [
contract ✓, liquidity ✓ ($334k),
honeypot ✓ (sim passed),
lp_burned ⚠ (0% burned)
]
}
✓ Full evidence — including a live honeypot simulation, the exact check Honeypot.is can't run here. Answered.
A real PulseChain token with a 14% sell tax: you can buy in, but you lose ~14% trying to get out. The big tools can't even look at it — we measure it with a live on-chain round-trip simulation.
● Captured live 2026-06-22 — token: 4WMM (0x8bf4…7792 — a confirmed fee-on-transfer rug)api.gopluslabs.io — token_security
GET /api/v1/token_security/369?contract_addresses=0x8bf4…7792
{
"code": 2022,
"message": "The main chain is not supported",
"result": null
}
✗ Can't assess it — the rug is invisible to GoPlus.
api.honeypot.is — IsHoneypot v2
GET /v2/IsHoneypot?address=0x8bf4…7792&chainID=369
{
"code": 400,
"error": "Invalid chain"
}
✗ Rejects chain 369 — the rug is invisible to Honeypot.is.
onchain.wick.pics — /api/v1/check
GET /api/v1/check?chain=pulsechain&address=0x8bf4…7792
{
"symbol": "4WMM",
"verdict": "HIGH_RISK",
"score": 36,
"honeypot": {
"status": "warn",
"measuredTaxPct": 14.1,
"roundTripLossPct": 14.94,
"detail": "measured sell tax ~14.1% — costs real money to exit"
}
}
✓ Flagged HIGH_RISK — measured the 14.1% sell tax with a live on-chain round-trip buy→sell simulation, the exact check the others can't run here.
Every price feed agents trust reads DexScreener's headline "liquidity." That number is the token side valued at market price — so a one-sided pool (common on 9mm V3) shows millions you cannot actually sell into. We measure the REAL exit liquidity from on-chain reserves.
● Verified on-chain 2026-06-22 — token: Crystite (0x2fA6…EC45 — a 9mm V3 one-sided DAI pool)the "liquidity" number most tools + price feeds read
{
"liquidity": { "usd": 12463848 }
}
✗ 20M tokens valued at market price — looks deeply liquid.
on-chain pool reserves = what you can actually sell into
{
"realExitLiquidity": "~$35",
"poolReserve": "17.59 DAI",
"verdict": "HIGH_RISK"
}
✓ One-sided pool — 17 DAI backing 20M tokens. You couldn't sell $100 into it. We read the chain, not the headline.
Don't take our word for it — that's the point. Paste these into a terminal.
The PulseChain coverage gap is a fact about the public APIs, not a marketing line. Run it:
# GoPlus — chain 369 → "main chain is not supported" curl "https://api.gopluslabs.io/api/v1/token_security/369?contract_addresses=0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39" # Honeypot.is — chain 369 → "Invalid chain" curl "https://api.honeypot.is/v2/IsHoneypot?address=0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39&chainID=369" # onchain.wick.pics — same token → a real verdict (free, no key) curl "https://onchain.wick.pics/api/v1/check?chain=pulsechain&address=0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39"
Coverage is worthless if the answer is junk. So we publish our work.